Quantcast
Channel: Comments on: House of Lords Inquiry: Personal Internet Security
Browsing all 21 articles
Browse latest View live

By: Andy Steingruebl

Mr. Brown, I remain unconvinced that a regulatory system closer to one that governs pharmaceuticals rather than the current regulatory regime wouldn’t at least be progress. We can certainly point to...

View Article


By: Richard G Brown

Andy, Thanks for the links to your postings; I’ll take a look.

View Article


By: Roger Gammans

As a sysadmin and developer in general I think software liability would be a good thing – tough I fear the devil will be truly in the details. For instance, where will the open source commutity fit in?...

View Article

By: Eric Norman

The impact of liability for security defects on the open source community is the same thing I wonder about. I suppose one could argue that since the user can inspect the source code, then open source...

View Article

By: Igor Drokov

Reading the report and statements, I could not fail to notice that their Lordships adopted 5 out of 6 recommendations by ordinary users from a small computer club. Given the unprecedented access to a...

View Article


By: Clive Robinson

@Igor Drokov In your three points above about what you thought might happen you neglected to mention TPM, DRM and Secure Licencing. In a way you kind of missed out an essential point with...

View Article

By: giafly

Software liability is a problem for FOSS as it’s free. There’s no money to pay for insurance etc. This could be fatal for them, so Bruce Schneier suggests that FOSS is exempt. Faced with this, my...

View Article

By: William Poel

This looks (predictably) like another convoluted self-perpetuating beanfeast for lawyers – coincidentally the profession that supplies more politicians than any other. Do you seriously believe this...

View Article


By: Richard Clayton

a) none of the Select Committee were lawyers by trade b) yes, having talked with them, yes I do believe that they are quick learners c) security may start with the users but it doesn’t end there. Users...

View Article


By: William Poel

I didn’t say that the current SSL scheme was satisfactory. Most of the bits of the internet infested by US corporate and political interests leave a lot to be desired, starting with the “management” of...

View Article

By: Andy Steingruebl

Mr. Brown, I remain unconvinced that a regulatory system closer to one that governs pharmaceuticals rather than the current regulatory regime wouldn’t at least be progress. We can certainly point to...

View Article

By: Richard G Brown

Andy, Thanks for the links to your postings; I’ll take a look.

View Article

By: Roger Gammans

As a sysadmin and developer in general I think software liability would be a good thing – tough I fear the devil will be truly in the details. For instance, where will the open source commutity fit in?...

View Article


By: Eric Norman

The impact of liability for security defects on the open source community is the same thing I wonder about. I suppose one could argue that since the user can inspect the source code, then open source...

View Article

By: Igor Drokov

Reading the report and statements, I could not fail to notice that their Lordships adopted 5 out of 6 recommendations by ordinary users from a small computer club. Given the unprecedented access to a...

View Article


By: Clive Robinson

@Igor Drokov In your three points above about what you thought might happen you neglected to mention TPM, DRM and Secure Licencing. In a way you kind of missed out an essential point with...

View Article

By: giafly

Software liability is a problem for FOSS as it’s free. There’s no money to pay for insurance etc. This could be fatal for them, so Bruce Schneier suggests that FOSS is exempt. Faced with this, my...

View Article


By: William Poel

This looks (predictably) like another convoluted self-perpetuating beanfeast for lawyers – coincidentally the profession that supplies more politicians than any other. Do you seriously believe this...

View Article

By: Richard Clayton

a) none of the Select Committee were lawyers by trade b) yes, having talked with them, yes I do believe that they are quick learners c) security may start with the users but it doesn’t end there. Users...

View Article

By: William Poel

I didn’t say that the current SSL scheme was satisfactory. Most of the bits of the internet infested by US corporate and political interests leave a lot to be desired, starting with the “management” of...

View Article
Browsing all 21 articles
Browse latest View live